7.1 Shape optimization via the shape derivative

In this tutorial we discuss the implementation of shape optimization algorithms to solve

\[\min_{\Omega} J(\Omega) := \int_{\Omega} f(x)\;dx, \quad f\in C^1(\mathbf{R}^d).\]

The analytic solution to this problem is

\[\Omega^*:= \{x\in \mathbf{R}^d:\; f(x)\le 0\}.\]

This problem is solved by fixing an initial guess \(\Omega_0\subset \mathbf{R}^d\) and then considering the problem

\[\min_{X} J((\mbox{id}+X)(\Omega_0)),\]

where \(X:\mathbf{R}^d \to \mathbf{R}^d\) are (at least) Lipschitz vector fields. We approximate \(X\) by a finite element function.

Initial geometry and shape function

We choose \(f\) as

\[\begin{split}\begin{array}{rl} f(x,y) =& \left(\sqrt{(x - a)^2 + b y^2} - 1 \right) \left(\sqrt{(x + a)^2 + b y^2} - 1 \right) \\ & \left(\sqrt{b x^2 + (y - a)^2} - 1 \right) \left(\sqrt{b x^2 + (y + a)^2} - 1 \right) - \varepsilon. \end{array}\end{split}\]

where \(\varepsilon = 0.001, a = 4/5, b = 2\). The corresponding zero level sets of this function are as follows. The green area indicates where \(f\) is negative.

13e8b17592e5488789b536009db895fe

Let us set up the geometry.

[1]:
# Generate the geometry
from ngsolve import *

# load Netgen/NGSolve and start the gui
from ngsolve.webgui import Draw
from netgen.geom2d import SplineGeometry

geo = SplineGeometry()
geo.AddCircle((0,0), r = 2.5)

ngmesh = geo.GenerateMesh(maxh = 0.08)
mesh = Mesh(ngmesh)
mesh.Curve(2)
[1]:
<ngsolve.comp.Mesh at 0x7efbffd00170>
[2]:
#gfset.vec[:]=0
#gfset.Set((0.2*x,0))
#mesh.SetDeformation(gfset)
#scene = Draw(gfzero,mesh,"gfset", deformation = gfset)
[3]:
# define the function f and its gradient
a =4.0/5.0
b = 2
f = CoefficientFunction((sqrt((x - a)**2 + b * y**2) - 1) \
                * (sqrt((x + a)**2 + b * y**2) - 1) \
                * (sqrt(b * x**2 + (y - a)**2) - 1) \
                * (sqrt(b * x**2 + (y + a)**2) - 1) - 0.001)

# gradient of f defined as vector valued coefficient function
grad_f = CoefficientFunction((f.Diff(x),f.Diff(y)))
[4]:
# vector space for shape gradient
VEC = H1(mesh, order=1, dim=2)

# grid function for deformation field
gfset = GridFunction(VEC)
gfX = GridFunction(VEC)

Draw(gfset)
[4]:
WebGLScene

Shape derivative

\[DJ(\Omega)(X) = \int_\Omega f \mbox{div}(X) + \nabla f\cdot X\;dx\]
[5]:
# Test and trial functions
PHI, PSI = VEC.TnT()

# shape derivative
dJOmega = LinearForm(VEC)
dJOmega += (div(PSI)*f + InnerProduct(grad_f, PSI) )*dx

Bilinear form

\[(\varphi,\psi) \mapsto b_\Omega(\varphi,\psi):= \int_\Omega (\nabla \varphi+\nabla \varphi^\top): \nabla\psi+\varphi\cdot \psi\; dx.\]

to compute the gradient \(X:= \mbox{grad}J(\Omega)\) by

\[b_\Omega(X,\psi) = DJ(\Omega)(\psi)\quad \text{ for all } \quad \psi \in H^1(\Omega)\]
[6]:
# bilinear form for H1 shape gradient; aX represents b_\Omega
aX = BilinearForm(VEC)
aX += InnerProduct(grad(PHI) + grad(PHI).trans, grad(PSI)) * dx
aX += InnerProduct(PHI, PSI) * dx

The first optimisation step

Fix an initial domain \(\Omega_0\) and define

\[\mathcal J_{\Omega_0}(X):= J((\mbox{id} + X)(\Omega_0)).\]

Then we have the following relation between the derivative of \(\mathcal J_{\Omega_0}\) and the shape derivative of \(J\):

\[D\mathcal J_{\Omega_0}(X_n)(X) = DJ((\mbox{id}+X_n)(\Omega_0))(X\circ(\mbox{id}+X_n)^{-1}).\]

Here

  • \((\mbox{id}+X_n)(\Omega_0)\) is current shape

Now we note that \(\varphi \mapsto \varphi\circ(\mbox{id}+X_n)^{-1}\) maps the finite element space on \((\mbox{id}+X_n)(\Omega_0)\) to the finite element space on \(\Omega_0\). Therefore the following are equivalent:

  • assembling \(\varphi \mapsto D\mathcal J_{\Omega_0}(X_n)(\varphi)\) on the fixed domain \(\Omega_0\)

  • assembling \(\varphi \mapsto DJ((\mbox{id}+X_n)(\Omega_0))(\varphi)\) on the deformed domain \((\mbox{id}+X_n)(\Omega_0)\).

[7]:
# deform current domain with gfset
mesh.SetDeformation(gfset)

# assemble on deformed domain
aX.Assemble()
dJOmega.Assemble()

mesh.UnsetDeformation()
# unset deformation

Now let’s make one optimization step with step size \(\alpha_1>0\):

\[\Omega_1 = (\mbox{id} - \alpha_1 X_0)(\Omega_0).\]
[8]:
# compute X_0
gfX.vec.data = aX.mat.Inverse(VEC.FreeDofs(), inverse="sparsecholesky") * dJOmega.vec

print("current cost ", Integrate(f*dx, mesh))
print("Gradient norm ", Norm(gfX.vec))

alpha = 20.0 / Norm(gfX.vec)

gfset.vec[:]=0
scene = Draw(gfset)
# input("A")
gfset.vec.data -= alpha * gfX.vec
mesh.SetDeformation(gfset)
#draw deformed shape
scene.Redraw()
# input("B")

print("cost after gradient step:", Integrate(f, mesh))
mesh.UnsetDeformation()
scene.Redraw()
current cost  63.58544055768985
Gradient norm  441.5929065866167
cost after gradient step: 5.023994315952169

Optimisation loop

Now we can set up an optimisation loop. In the second step we compute

\[\Omega_2 = (\mbox{id} - \alpha_0 X_0 - \alpha_1 X_1)(\Omega_0)\]

by the same procedure as above.

[9]:
import time


iter_max = 50
gfset.vec[:] = 0
mesh.SetDeformation(gfset)
scene = Draw(gfset,mesh,"gfset")

converged = False

alpha =0.11#100.0 / Norm(gfX.vec)
# input("A")
for k in range(iter_max):
    mesh.SetDeformation(gfset)
    scene.Redraw()
    Jold = Integrate(f, mesh)
    print("cost at iteration ", k, ': ', Jold)

    # assemble bilinear form
    aX.Assemble()

    # assemble shape derivative
    dJOmega.Assemble()

    mesh.UnsetDeformation()

    gfX.vec.data = aX.mat.Inverse(VEC.FreeDofs(), inverse="sparsecholesky") * dJOmega.vec

    # step size control

    gfset_old = gfset.vec.CreateVector()
    gfset_old.data = gfset.vec

    Jnew = Jold + 1
    while Jnew > Jold:

        gfset.vec.data = gfset_old
        gfset.vec.data -= alpha * gfX.vec

        mesh.SetDeformation(gfset)

        Jnew = Integrate(f, mesh)

        mesh.UnsetDeformation()

        if Jnew > Jold:
            print("reducing step size")
            alpha = 0.9*alpha
        else:
            print("linesearch step accepted")
            alpha = alpha*1.5
            break

    print("step size: ", alpha, '\n')

    time.sleep(0.1)
    Jold = Jnew

cost at iteration  0 :  63.58544055768985
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.165

cost at iteration  1 :  -0.738254540552506
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.2475

cost at iteration  2 :  -0.8176867041657307
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.37124999999999997

cost at iteration  3 :  -0.9325775036547923
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.556875

cost at iteration  4 :  -1.07016091722071
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.8353125

cost at iteration  5 :  -1.1521932981049592
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.25296875

cost at iteration  6 :  -1.154748206242885
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.52235703125

cost at iteration  7 :  -1.154955030640749
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.4982276723046877

cost at iteration  8 :  -1.1550471182642865
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.3270326873287925

cost at iteration  9 :  -1.1554534107715186
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.4511102435940346

cost at iteration  10 :  -1.1555975937049026
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.4281101462330694

cost at iteration  11 :  -1.1556252951639108
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.4054746004152756

cost at iteration  12 :  -1.1558537093254497
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.3831978279986936

cost at iteration  13 :  -1.155956915499012
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.3612741424249144

cost at iteration  14 :  -1.1561527931843583
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.3396979472674797

cost at iteration  15 :  -1.1561633003430372
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.1866173613229614

cost at iteration  16 :  -1.1563067482063283
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0510285285313932

cost at iteration  17 :  -1.1563736701659089
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.034369726354171

cost at iteration  18 :  -1.1564003185514078
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0179749661914572

cost at iteration  19 :  -1.1564107875935878
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0018400629773228

cost at iteration  20 :  -1.1564509045111546
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9859608979791321

cost at iteration  21 :  -1.1565107679749391
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9703334177461629

cost at iteration  22 :  -1.1565852374271406
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9549536330748863

cost at iteration  23 :  -1.1566653246131884
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9398176179906492

cost at iteration  24 :  -1.1567405554672066
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.027690565272775

cost at iteration  25 :  -1.1567416778332902
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0114016698132016

cost at iteration  26 :  -1.1567526503917527
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9953709533466624

cost at iteration  27 :  -1.156774772484465
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9795943237361178

cost at iteration  28 :  -1.156804369104932
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9640677537049005

cost at iteration  29 :  -1.1568391174358499
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9487872798086778

cost at iteration  30 :  -1.1568738713243505
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9337490014237104

cost at iteration  31 :  -1.1569061928764737
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0210545330568275

cost at iteration  32 :  -1.1569106526567583
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0048708187078768

cost at iteration  33 :  -1.156919026053408
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.988943616231357

cost at iteration  34 :  -1.1569303603266774
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.97326885991409

cost at iteration  35 :  -1.156944276358052
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9578425484844518

cost at iteration  36 :  -1.1569588543052922
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9426607440909731

cost at iteration  37 :  -1.1569732380754987
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0307995236634793

cost at iteration  38 :  -1.1569759057953024
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0144613512134133

cost at iteration  39 :  -1.1569802651385417
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9983821387966807

cost at iteration  40 :  -1.1569860038671813
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9825577818967535

cost at iteration  41 :  -1.1569932294443086
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.96698424105369

cost at iteration  42 :  -1.1570010425039097
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.05739726759221

cost at iteration  43 :  -1.1570011999144414
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0406375209008738

cost at iteration  44 :  -1.157001977135632
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0241434161945948

cost at iteration  45 :  -1.1570042248609775
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.0079107430479106

cost at iteration  46 :  -1.1570078095931227
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9919353577706012

cost at iteration  47 :  -1.1570130549871247
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9762131823499371

cost at iteration  48 :  -1.157019211552103
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  0.9607402034096908

cost at iteration  49 :  -1.15702607786857
reducing step size
reducing step size
reducing step size
linesearch step accepted
step size:  1.050569412428497

Using SciPy optimize toolbox

We use the package scipy.optimize and wrap the shape functions around it.

We first setup the initial geometry as a circle of radius r = 2.5 (as before)

[10]:
# The code in this cell is the same as in the example above.

from ngsolve import *
from ngsolve.webgui import Draw
from netgen.geom2d import SplineGeometry

import numpy as np

ngsglobals.msg_level = 1

geo = SplineGeometry()
geo.AddCircle((0,0), r = 2.5)

ngmesh = geo.GenerateMesh(maxh = 0.08)
mesh = Mesh(ngmesh)
mesh.Curve(2)

# define the function f

a =4.0/5.0
b = 2
f = CoefficientFunction((sqrt((x - a)**2 + b * y**2) - 1) \
                * (sqrt((x + a)**2 + b * y**2) - 1) \
                * (sqrt(b * x**2 + (y - a)**2) - 1) \
                * (sqrt(b * x**2 + (y + a)**2) - 1) - 0.001)

# Now we define the finite element space VEC in which we compute the shape gradient

# element order
order = 1

VEC = H1(mesh, order=order, dim=2)

# define test and trial functions
PHI = VEC.TrialFunction()
PSI = VEC.TestFunction()


# define grid function for deformation of mesh
gfset = GridFunction(VEC)
gfset.Set((0,0))

# only for new gui
#scene = Draw(gfset, mesh, "gfset")

#if scene:
#    scene.setDeformation(True)

# plot the mesh and visualise deformation
#Draw(gfset,mesh,"gfset")
#SetVisualization (deformation=True)
 Generate Mesh from spline geometry
 Curve elements, order = 2

Shape derivative

\[DJ(\Omega)(X) = \int_\Omega f \mbox{div}(X) + \nabla f\cdot X\;dx\]
[11]:
fX = LinearForm(VEC)

# analytic shape derivative
fX += f*div(PSI)*dx + (f.Diff(x,PSI[0])) *dx + (f.Diff(y,PSI[1])) *dx

Bilinear form for shape gradient

Define the bilinear form

\[(\varphi,\psi) \mapsto b_\Omega(\varphi,\psi):= \int_\Omega (\nabla \varphi+\nabla \varphi^\top): \nabla\psi + \varphi\cdot\psi\; dx\]

to compute the gradient \(X =: \mbox{grad}J\) by

\[b_\Omega(X,\psi) = DJ(\Omega)(\psi)\quad \text{ for all } \psi\in H^1(\Omega)\]
[12]:
# Cauchy-Riemann descent CR
CR = False

# bilinear form for gradient
aX = BilinearForm(VEC)
aX += InnerProduct(grad(PHI)+grad(PHI).trans, grad(PSI))*dx + InnerProduct(PHI,PSI)*dx

## Cauchy-Riemann regularisation

if CR == True:
    gamma = 100
    aX += gamma * (PHI.Deriv()[0,0] - PHI.Deriv()[1,1])*(PSI.Deriv()[0,0] - PSI.Deriv()[1,1]) *dx
    aX += gamma * (PHI.Deriv()[1,0] + PHI.Deriv()[0,1])*(PSI.Deriv()[1,0] + PSI.Deriv()[0,1]) *dx


aX.Assemble()
invaX = aX.mat.Inverse(VEC.FreeDofs(), inverse="sparsecholesky")

gfX = GridFunction(VEC)

Wrapping the shape function and its gradient

Now we define the shape function \(J\) and its gradient grad(J) use the shape derivative \(DJ\). The arguments of \(J\) and grad(J) are vector in \(\mathbf{R}^d\), where \(d\) is the dimension of the finite element space.

[13]:
def J(x_):

    gfset.Set((0,0))
    # x_ NumPy vector
    gfset.vec.FV().NumPy()[:] += x_

    mesh.SetDeformation(gfset)

    cost_c = Integrate (f, mesh)

    mesh.UnsetDeformation()

    Redraw(blocking=True)

    return cost_c

def gradJ(x_, euclid = False):

    gfset.Set((0,0))
    # x_ NumPy vector
    gfset.vec.FV().NumPy()[:] += x_

    mesh.SetDeformation(gfset)

    fX.Assemble()

    mesh.UnsetDeformation()

    if euclid == True:
        gfX.vec.data = fX.vec
    else:
        gfX.vec.data = invaX * fX.vec

    return gfX.vec.FV().NumPy().copy()

Gradient descent and Armijo rule

We use the functions \(J\) and grad J to define a steepest descent method.We use scipy.optimize.line_search_armijo to compute the step size in each iteration. The Arjmijo rule reads

\[J((\mbox{Id}+\alpha_k X_k)(\Omega_k)) \le J(\Omega_k) - c_1 \alpha_k \|\nabla J(\Omega_k)\|^2,\]

where \(c_1:= 1e-4\) and \(\alpha_k\) is the step size.

[14]:
# import scipy linesearch method
# from scipy.optimize.linesearch import line_search_armijo
# try:
#    from scipy.optimize._linesearch import line_search_armijo   # SciPy >= 1.8
# except ImportError:
#    from scipy.optimize.linesearch import line_search_armijo    # older SciPy

def line_search_armijo(f, xk, pk, gfk, old_fval, c1=1e-4, alpha0=1.0):
    phi0 = f(xk) if old_fval is None else old_fval
    derphi0 = np.dot(gfk, pk)
    alpha, nfev = alpha0, 0
    for _ in range(30):
        fval = f(xk + alpha * pk); nfev += 1
        if fval <= phi0 + c1 * alpha * derphi0:
            return alpha, nfev, fval
        alpha *= 0.5
    return None, nfev, phi0


def gradient_descent(x0, J_, gradJ_):

    xk_ = np.copy(x0)

    # maximal iteration
    it_max = 50
    # count number of function evals
    nfval_total = 0

    print('\n')
    for i in range(1, it_max):

        # Compute a step size using a line_search to satisfy the Wolf
        # compute shape gradient grad J
        grad_xk = gradJ_(xk_,euclid = False)

        # compute descent direction
        pk = -gradJ_(xk_)

        # eval cost function
        fold = J_(xk_)

        # perform armijo stepsize

        if CR == True:
            alpha0 = 0.15
        else:
            alpha0 = 0.11



        step, nfval, b = line_search_armijo(J_, xk_, pk = pk, gfk = grad_xk, old_fval = fold, c1=1e-4, alpha0 = alpha0)
        nfval_total += nfval

        # update the shape and print cost and gradient norm
        xk_ = xk_ - step * grad_xk
        print('Iteration ', i, '| Cost ', fold, '| grad norm', np.linalg.norm(grad_xk))

        mesh.SetDeformation(gfset)
        scene.Redraw()
        mesh.UnsetDeformation()

        if np.linalg.norm(gradJ_(xk_)) < 1e-4:

            #print('#######################################')
            print('\n'+'{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("##################################", ""))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("### success - accuracy reached ###", ""))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("##################################", ""))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("gradient norm: ", np.linalg.norm(gradJ_(xk_))))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("n evals f: ", nfval_total))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("f val: ", fold) + '\n')
            break
        elif i == it_max-1:

            #print('######################################')
            print('\n'+'{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("#######################", ""))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("### maxiter reached ###", ""))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("#######################", ""))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("gradient norm: ", np.linalg.norm(gradJ_(xk_))))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("n evals f: ", nfval_total))
            print('{:<20}  {:<12} '.format("f val: ", fold) + '\n')

Now we are ready to run our first optimisation algorithm:

[15]:
gfset.vec[:]=0
x0 = gfset.vec.FV().NumPy() # initial guess = 0
scene = Draw(gfset, mesh, "gfset")
gradient_descent(x0, J, gradJ)


Iteration  1 | Cost  63.58544055768985 | grad norm 441.5929065866169
Iteration  2 | Cost  -0.738254540552506 | grad norm 4.795270097704415
Iteration  3 | Cost  -0.785772763146643 | grad norm 4.810253357264034
Iteration  4 | Cost  -0.834010074162516 | grad norm 4.778142295071014
Iteration  5 | Cost  -0.8819828810623977 | grad norm 4.690302282301073
Iteration  6 | Cost  -0.9285213589747617 | grad norm 4.5397982631673575
Iteration  7 | Cost  -0.9723556245428674 | grad norm 4.322976857862519
Iteration  8 | Cost  -1.0122531682835856 | grad norm 4.04105181526849
Iteration  9 | Cost  -1.0471884111239973 | grad norm 3.7012245498532246
Iteration  10 | Cost  -1.0765044830550639 | grad norm 3.316885832891531
Iteration  11 | Cost  -1.1000163330677026 | grad norm 2.906202755156897
Iteration  12 | Cost  -1.1180151853481513 | grad norm 2.489788164133312
Iteration  13 | Cost  -1.131171998485402 | grad norm 2.0875804970132315
Iteration  14 | Cost  -1.14037467642678 | grad norm 1.7159371235340144
Iteration  15 | Cost  -1.1465561839174976 | grad norm 1.385718678918182
Iteration  16 | Cost  -1.1505622106495064 | grad norm 1.1024720780232362
Iteration  17 | Cost  -1.1530807107883256 | grad norm 0.8664390301856512
Iteration  18 | Cost  -1.1546253818026362 | grad norm 0.6744733131571095
Iteration  19 | Cost  -1.1555550069868308 | grad norm 0.5214023587336207
Iteration  20 | Cost  -1.1561072041599014 | grad norm 0.40125724712232974
Iteration  21 | Cost  -1.1564329219351202 | grad norm 0.30812647847843966
Iteration  22 | Cost  -1.1566250019098752 | grad norm 0.2366460842080783
Iteration  23 | Cost  -1.1567391511183982 | grad norm 0.18221681468365186
Iteration  24 | Cost  -1.1568081782564767 | grad norm 0.1410442451728761
Iteration  25 | Cost  -1.156851143672455 | grad norm 0.11008000257674284
Iteration  26 | Cost  -1.1568790147384713 | grad norm 0.08691942912250199
Iteration  27 | Cost  -1.1568980658952455 | grad norm 0.06968543512602497
Iteration  28 | Cost  -1.1569118763196693 | grad norm 0.05692156240844297
Iteration  29 | Cost  -1.1569224898912507 | grad norm 0.04750014325185898
Iteration  30 | Cost  -1.1569310797324186 | grad norm 0.04055031381079077
Iteration  31 | Cost  -1.1569383260293806 | grad norm 0.035404371147590444
Iteration  32 | Cost  -1.1569446301476731 | grad norm 0.03155781707996613
Iteration  33 | Cost  -1.1569502351939924 | grad norm 0.028637497719291145
Iteration  34 | Cost  -1.1569552935463383 | grad norm 0.026373993717594742
Iteration  35 | Cost  -1.1569599053139974 | grad norm 0.024577086183133326
Iteration  36 | Cost  -1.1569641397932513 | grad norm 0.02311474669624772
Iteration  37 | Cost  -1.1569680476107744 | grad norm 0.021896245450960323
Iteration  38 | Cost  -1.156971667734236 | grad norm 0.020859390544323834
Iteration  39 | Cost  -1.156975031503332 | grad norm 0.019961362418991987
Iteration  40 | Cost  -1.1569781648802602 | grad norm 0.019172877193450764
Iteration  41 | Cost  -1.1569810896434538 | grad norm 0.01847191228418589
Iteration  42 | Cost  -1.1569838257845129 | grad norm 0.017845413165404424
Iteration  43 | Cost  -1.1569863886485672 | grad norm 0.017278988193844106
Iteration  44 | Cost  -1.1569887950477002 | grad norm 0.01676565064074146
Iteration  45 | Cost  -1.1569910584232708 | grad norm 0.01629879591809281
Iteration  46 | Cost  -1.1569931906328965 | grad norm 0.015873146903417634
Iteration  47 | Cost  -1.1569952027417363 | grad norm 0.015485165897309285
Iteration  48 | Cost  -1.1569971040368816 | grad norm 0.015129700903153891
Iteration  49 | Cost  -1.1569989040745596 | grad norm 0.01480437146262209

#######################
### maxiter reached ###
#######################
gradient norm:        0.014506461247563517
n evals f:            49
f val:                -1.1569989040745596

L-BFGS method

Now we use the L-BFGS method provided by SciPy. The BFGS method requires the shape function \(J\) and its gradient grad J. We can also specify additional arguments in options, such as maximal iterations and the gradient tolerance.

In the BFGS method we replace

\[b_\Omega(X,\varphi) = \nabla J(\Omega)(\varphi)\]

by

\[H_\Omega(X,\varphi) = \nabla J(\Omega)(\varphi),\]

where \(H_\Omega\) is an approximation of the second shape derivative at \(\Omega\). On the discrete level we solve

\[\begin{split}\begin{array}{rl} \text{ solve }\quad B_nX_k & = \nabla J(\Omega_k) \\ & \\ \text{ update } \quad s_k & := -\alpha_k p_k \\ y_k & := \nabla J_h(\Omega_{k+1}) - \nabla J_h(\Omega_k) \\ B_{k+1} &:= B_k + \frac{y_k\otimes y_k}{y_k\cdot s_k} + \frac{B_ks_k\otimes B_ks_k}{B_ky_k\cdot B_ks_k}. \end{array}\end{split}\]
[16]:
from scipy.optimize import minimize

x0 = gfset.vec.FV().NumPy()

# options for optimiser

options = {"maxiter":1000,
              "gtol":1e-10}

# we use quasi-Newton method L-BFGS
minimize(J, x0, method='L-BFGS-B', jac=gradJ, options=options)

[16]:
  message: CONVERGENCE: RELATIVE REDUCTION OF F <= FACTR*EPSMCH
  success: True
   status: 0
      fun: -1.1571141910331146
        x: [-5.215e-04  6.981e-01 ... -1.464e-03  4.577e-03]
      nit: 16
      jac: [-7.356e-08 -5.266e-04 ...  4.357e-06 -3.471e-06]
     nfev: 116
     njev: 116
 hess_inv: <7760x7760 LbfgsInvHessProduct with dtype=float64>

Improving mesh quality via Cauchy-Riemann equations

In the previous section we computed the shape gradient grad J:= X of \(J\) at \(\Omega\) via

\[\int_{\Omega} \nabla X : \nabla \varphi + X\cdot \varphi\; dx = DJ(\Omega)(\varphi) \quad \forall \varphi \in H^1(\Omega)^d.\]

This may lead to overly stretched or even degenerated triangles. One way to improve this is to modify the above equation by

\[\int_{\Omega} \nabla X : \nabla \varphi + X\cdot \varphi + \color{red}\gamma \color{red}B\color{red}X\cdot \color{red}B\color{red}\varphi\;dx = DJ(\Omega)(\varphi) \; \forall \varphi \in H^1(\Omega)^d,\]

where

\[\begin{split}B := \begin{pmatrix} -\partial_x & \partial_y \\ \partial_y & \partial_x \end{pmatrix}\end{split}\]

The two equations \(BX = 0\) are precisely the Cauchy-Riemann equations \(-\partial_x X_1 + \partial_y X_2=0\) and \(\partial_y X_1 + \partial_x X_2\). So the bigger \(\gamma\) the more angle preserving is the gradient. So by adding the B term we enforce conformaty with strength \(\gamma\).

This only means we need to add the \(\alpha\) term to the above bilinear form aX:

[17]:
alpha = 100

aX += alpha * (PHI.Deriv()[0,0] - PHI.Deriv()[1,1])*(PSI.Deriv()[0,0] - PSI.Deriv()[1,1]) *dx
aX += alpha * (PHI.Deriv()[1,0] + PHI.Deriv()[0,1])*(PSI.Deriv()[1,0] + PSI.Deriv()[0,1]) *dx
[ ]: